An introduction to the new vehicle I design

 

Dear friends:

Hello! My name is He kaihao. I work in Chinese Traditional Medicine Hospital of Ningbo. It is my pleasure to introduce the new-designed vehicle which, I believe, will solute the problem of traffic jam when private cars are popular in the future. Everyone dreams of having his own private car, however, what will happen when the dreams become reality? As we all know, in the developed countries the explosion of private cars has caused a lot of problems such as traffic jam, air pollution, energy sources etc. Although there are many intersections and high-grade roads as wide as the river in the developed countries, which has cost a lot of money, traffic jam cannot be avoided, let alone the environment pollution. The basic reason of the problem is that the body of the private car is too huge. One about fifty kg people occupies a car of several thousand kg, which pollutes the air and wastes the energy. It is too luxurious for a half-meter wide people to occupy one roadway of several meters.

I have designed a kind of fast-travel vehicle that is lighter and smaller than the common cars we see today. It is a transfiguration of roller coaster in the pleasure ground, which will readily solve the problem of traffic and environment. See figure 1

 

          The profile of track, road surface, and track-bite wheels from the red line (see figure 2)

 

 

          

 

The car above is, I think, the ideal vehicle that carries people. It is a little wider than the motorcycle. It is no longer than a motorcycle, which can also carry 2-3 people. The biggest difference between the car and the common vehicle we see today is that it has two track-bite wheels. When track-bite wheels grasp the track, the electric energy from the cables is transmit to the car by electric brushes, which makes the car run fast, just like roller coaster. When track-bite wheels loosen the track, the electric brushes retract. Then, the car is operated by food or through storage batteries. In a way, it is a four-wheeled bicycle. Because the body is small, its drive equipment is electric machinery (wheels), and track-bite wheels’ loose/grasp the track can be operated by electromagnet. The car needs little gearing equipments, so it is light. If the body is made from carbon fiber or other engineering plastics, and the windshield is made from polyester glass, it will be so light that people can move it himself. The car is as flexible and convenient as bicycle, the power consumption of which is next to nothing.  

When the car drives on the track and goes through the crossing, how it is kept on its roadway? I have two methods to solve the problem. One is to fix journey switch on the track; the other way is to add another two pairs of track-bite wheels at the bottom of the car. Let me illustrate the first one with the crossings sample of the right-hand bend.

First, two gaps are set in the intersection between straight roadway and right-hand bend roadway. Then fill tucks on each gap to joint the tracks smoothly. (See right-hand bend sketch map, the red tuck 1 and the blue tuck 2)

 

 

The tucks are mutually exclusive. The meaning is that when the tuck 1 rises to the gap, the blue tuck 2 will go down. Then the car goes straight. There are two journey switches on the right of tracks before the crossing that control the tucks. There are four control sticks on the car. One pair of sticks on the left is left-hand bend operating handle while the other pair of sticks on the right is right-hand bend operating handle. The sticks of each pair are mutually exclusive. Take the right pair of sticks for example, when the straight stick is pressed, the right-hand bend stick will bounce. While the right-hand stick is pressed, the straight stick will bounce. Usually the straight sticks on the two sides are pressed. When the car turns right, drivers will press the right-hand stick on the right side before it reaches the journey switch. The bottom of the stick will stand out of the car bed. When the car reaches the switch, the contact will open up the switch. So the red tuck 1 will rise to the gap, and the tuck 2 will go down. Then the car turns right. When the car goes straight, the straight stick is pressed. The bottom of the stick will stand out of the car bed. When the car reaches the switch, the contact will open up the switch. So the blue tuck 2 will rise to the gap, and the red tuck 1 will go down. Then the car goes straight. The left-hand bend is similar to the right.    

I think the way above is not bad for a car to make a turn, but after careful consideration I found it still has one shortcoming. The electro-mechanical device is inevitable in this design. The crossing should fulfill the need of vehicles from every direction, so there are many electro-mechanical devices and tucks. It is impossible to check and maintain so many devices. In a way, the devices’ disorder is unavoidable. In order to find a solution, I have evolved an idea – to add another two pairs of track-bite wheels at the bottom of the car, oriented track-bite wheels and rudder track-bite wheels. (See figure 4)  

 

 

Then what we need is not the tucks but only the gaps on the tracks. So it is much more reliable than the journey switch method. The car can make a turn through different ways. (Oriented track-bite wheels have different shapes for different ways. The scenograph is just a sample.) Its operating principle is too complex for me to introduce here. What a regret!   

The car is small and light. Driven on the tracks, cars are close to each other and we needn’t worry about the collision. The car occupies a narrow roadway, as wide as the width of the car. The width of the green belt can build two roadways. A bi-directional four-roadway road occupies only the space as wide as two green belts. It is easy to build elevated road even the multilevel elevated road, because the car is light. The complete crossover of the crossing is not difficult. We needn’t intersections. The concrete tube in the channel under the pavement will be “the metro”. The car is light and consumes little energy. So my design will economize the road space, no fuel, and no pollution.  

If my design is popularized, how to make best use of the road? I suggest constructing the roadways into four functional frameworks. The first is no-track framework. The second is crossover framework. The third is straight roadway framework. The forth is suburb roadway framework.  

No-track framework: as we conclude from its name, no-track framework means that the car drives like a bicycle.

Crossover framework: crossover framework is complete crossover. The design is complex and it is the basic one.

 

 

 (In fact, the actual road is multi-roadway, even more complex. But it is not easy to build because it is narrow.) Although the car goes faster through the crossing above than through the grade crossing with traffic lights, the cars from every directions has the possibility to collide with each other (see figure 5). The car going straight may collide with the cars turning left or right. So, the speed can’t be too high when the car is near the crossing. The bottleneck of the traffic is still the crossing. As we all know, the faster cars travel on the road, the higher the road’s traffic capacity is. In order to enhance the traffic capacity, to make cars travel faster, I have designed the roadway with another functional framework – 

Straight roadway framework: the framework makes each straight roadway into an absolute roadway unit. With on-track approach road and off-track approach road, it does not connect with other roadways. The car travels in a fixed and high speed on the roadway of one layer, until it reach its destination – off-track approach road. If a car will get on the track of this layer, the driver should be certain that there are no cars on the straight track enough away from the intersect between on-track approach road and straight roadway. If the cars on the straight roadway travel continuously, the driver will have to wait there. So the cars running straight have the absolute priority, which travel in a relatively fixed speed. The cars on the on-track approach road give out of the road. This is considered for the long-travel cars. Although it takes some time to get on the track, but the car can travel fast once it gets on the track. So it saves time on the whole. Since the roadway does not connect with others, how the cars on the longitude tracks go to the transverse tracks? In my design, the cars should get off the longitude tracks first, then get on the transverse tracks. In order to solve the problem of getting on and off the tracks, the longitude tracks can connect with the transverse tracks, which is similar like the second framework with continuous roadway. But it is different with approach road. Cars there should slow down there, and stop to see if there is the chance to get on the tracks. So the approach road should be long enough to contain the mass waiting vehicles. The traffic capacity of the straight roadway increases, because there is no bottleneck on the straight roadway. If the modern information technology is applied to show the traffic information on the screen of the crossings, the cars will be dispatched reasonable and the traffic capacity of roadway will greatly increase. The roadway is convenient for the long-distance traveling. (See figure 7)

 

If the urban highway is as crisscross as a chessboard (see figure), then people can reach one point in the city from the other point with one time’s roadway change. Now the urban highway is different, but two times’ roadway change is enough. Compensated the time of waiting to change tracks, the high speed driving will save much time for the long-distance travel.

Suburb roadway framework: the drive mode on it is similar to the third, but the roadway is long enough to extend to next city. Because there are little crossings, cars on the tracks can travel fast and safely with necessary protectors. During busy hours in the city, it is temporary urban highway, which is the buffer of the straight roadway framework.  

The four functional frameworks is not the four altitudes framework. We can put the third or the forth framework on the ground and the second on the elevated road. And the design of four functional frameworks is for only trunk roads. One track is enough for some back street and alleyway. We can adjust measures according to different conditions.

In order to introduce my ideas in brief, the sketch map above illustrates only the single roadway. In fact, since the roadway is narrow, multi-roadways can be easily realized.